ARCOM

Abstracts – Browse Results

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 12 results ...

Barajei, C, Kusi, E, Ackon, F, Osman, A M, Mohammed, A M Z, Simpeh, F and Gyimah, F (2024) Success factors of the consultant selection stage of the Ghanaian public construction projects: The road sector’s perspective. Construction Economics and Building, 24(01-02), 144-62.

Bello, A O, Abdulraheem, A A, Afolabi, O P, Aka, A and Gbenga, P O (2024) Assessing the underlying factors affecting trust and transparency in the construction industry: A mixed method approach. Construction Economics and Building, 24(01-02), 3-28.

Chiponde, D, Gledson, B and Greenwood, D (2024) The institutional field of learning from project-related failures: opportunities and challenges. Construction Economics and Building, 24(01-02), 163-81.

Domínguez-Herrera, M M, González-Morales, O and González-Díaz, E (2023) Social responsibility of construction company as strategy for sustainability in island territories. Construction Economics and Building, 23(01-02), 30-55.

Hong, J, Akotia, J and Egbu, C (2024) Virtual reality in construction activities: Barriers for adoption in China. Construction Economics and Building, 24(01-02), 77-93.

Kapogiannis, G, Palaios, P and Sawhney, A (2024) Digital construction led growth asymmetries in Europe: The need for collaborative culture. Construction Economics and Building, 24(01-02), 50-76.

Khan, I H and Munawer, T (2024) A systematic review of economic sustainability of vertical greenery systems for buildings. Construction Economics and Building, 24(01-02), 119-43.

Type: Journal Article
Keywords: economic performance; economic sustainability; green facades; living walls; vertical greenery system
ISBN/ISSN: 2204-9029
URL: https://doi.org/10.5130/ajceb.v24i1/2.8710
Abstract:
Urban areas have been greatly affected by climate change, leading to a rise in global temperatures. Vertical Greenery Systems (VGSs) are becoming increasingly important as a means of mitigating the effects of climate change. This research assessed the economic feasibility of VGSs to reduce the effects of climate change and enhance urban sustainability. Seventeen studies were evaluated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to determine the various costs, benefits, and economic indicators associated with VGS. Furthermore, the net present value, internal rate of return, and payback period were thoroughly evaluated to gain insight into their long-term economic sustainability. The results show that, even though the initial cost of VGS may be high, it can provide long-term financial advantages to building owners and operators through energy savings, increased property values, and decreased operational expenses. Nevertheless, the extended payback period and negative net present values for certain VGS types make them financially unsustainable. The purpose of this review is to help create evidence-based guidelines and suggestions for the successful implementation of sustainable VGS.

Suriyanon, N, Sutheerawatthana, P, Kaewmoracharoen, M and Klansai, V (2023) The utility and value of contract terms: A case study on interior contractors. Construction Economics and Building, 23(01-02), 77-94.

Uddin, S M J, Albert, A, Pradhananga, N, Ganapati, N E and Prajapati, J (2023) Health and safety challenges among post-disaster reconstruction workers. Construction Economics and Building, 23(01-02), 4-30.